Gastar Exploration Inc.
Gastar Exploration Inc. (Form: DEF 14A, Received: 05/22/2017 15:58:01)

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

 

 

 

Filed by the Registrant 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 

 

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

 

 

 

Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

 

 

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

 

 

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

 

 

 

Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12

Gastar Exploration Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 

No fee required.

 

 

 

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5)

 

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

 

 

 

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)

 

Amount previously paid:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2)

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3)

 

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4)

 

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Gastar Exploration Inc.

1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650

Houston, Texas 77010

NOTICE OF THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

To our Stockholders:

The 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Gastar Exploration Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on Tuesday, June 27, 2017, 10:00 a.m., central time, at the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010. At the Annual Meeting, holders of the Company’s common stock will consider and vote on the following proposals:

1.

To elect the six (6) nominees named in the proxy statement accompanying this notice (the “Proxy Statement”) as members of our board of directors to serve until our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and their successors are elected and qualified;

2.

To ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017;

3.

To approve on a non-binding advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers (“Named Executive Officers”);

4.

To approve on a non-binding advisory basis the frequency (every one, two or three years) with which an advisory vote on compensation of our Named Executive Officers should be held;

5.

To approve an amendment to the Gastar Exploration Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for awards under the plan as well as certain other additional changes;

6.

To approve an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 550,000,000 to 800,000,000 shares; and

7.

To transact any such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on May 10, 2017, which is the record date to establish holders of common stock for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to notice of and to attend the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof and to vote on the above listed matters at the Annual Meeting. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection starting on June 16, 2017 through June 26, 2017 during usual business hours at our offices at 1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650, Houston, Texas 77010, and will also be available for inspection at the Annual Meeting.

It is important that your shares of common stock are represented at the Annual Meeting, whether or not you plan to attend in person and regardless of the number of shares of common stock you own. If you are a stockholder whose shares of common stock are registered in your name, to ensure your shares of common stock are represented, we urge you to submit a proxy containing your voting instructions as soon as possible via the Internet per the instructions provided or by signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided for that purpose, in the manner described in the Proxy Statement. Even if you submit your proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain from the record holder a proxy issued in your name.

The specific details of the matters proposed to be dealt with at the Annual Meeting are set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

 


 

Holders of the Company’s outstanding  Special Voting Preferred Stock , currently consisting of funds managed indirectly by Ares Management LLC, are also entitled to notice of and to attend the Annual Meeting at which the holders of Special Voting Preferred Stock, voting exclusively and separately as a class, will be entitle d to elect two additional directors to our board of directors, subject to the holders meeting certain beneficial ownership thresholds.  As there will be no record date set with respect to voting the Special Voting Preferred Stock at the Annual Meeting, hol ders of record of the Special Voting Preferred Stock as of the business day prior to the date of the Annual Meeting will be entitled to vote such shares at the Annual Meeting. Holders of Special Voting Preferred Stock will not be entitled to vote for other director nominees or on any other matter at the Annual Meeting.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 2017.

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2016 are available at http://www.proxyvote.com.

 

DATED this 22nd day of May 2017.

 


 

 

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

/s/ J. RUSSELL PORTER

 

J. Russell Porter

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 


 

Gastar Exploration Inc.

1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650

Houston, Texas 77010

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE

2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) contains information about the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Gastar Exploration Inc. (“Gastar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”). The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 27, 2017, 10:00 a.m., central time, at the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010.

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to our common stockholders in connection with the solicitation by our board of directors (the “Board”) of proxies to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. As a stockholder, your vote is very important, and the Board strongly encourages you to exercise your right to vote whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Shares of common stock cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting unless the owner is present to vote or is represented by proxy. All proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions they contain.

The matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting are set forth below and in the accompanying Notice and are explained in more detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.  Additionally, funds managed indirectly by Ares Management LLC (“Ares”), as holders of all of our outstanding shares of Special Voting Preferred Stock, and 54,917,736 shares, or 25.9% of our outstanding common stock as of May 10, 2017, the record date established for the Annual Meeting, have nominated, and are expected to elect at the Annual Meeting, two directors to serve on our Board.  At the Annual Meeting, we will report on our business and financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2016, including our audited consolidated financial statements and the auditor’s report for the year ended December 31, 2016, and other information concerning us that can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, a copy of which is included in our 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders (the “2016 Annual Report”). The 2016 Annual Report does not constitute a part of our proxy solicitation materials.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 2017.

In accordance with rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board for the Annual Meeting, we have made our proxy materials available to you free of charge on the Internet in addition to delivering paper versions of these materials to you by mail (including the Notice, this Proxy Statement, the 2016 Annual Report and a form of proxy).  Beginning on or about May 26, 2017, these proxy materials are being mailed to our stockholders and are available on the Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com .

 

 

 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

Questions and Answers about the Proxy Materials, the Annual Meeting and Voting

1

 

 

Information about Directors, Director Nominees, Executive Officers and Members of Management

7

 

 

Corporate Governance

9

 

 

Information about our Committees of the Board

12

 

 

Executive Compensation

16

 

 

Directors’ Compensation

31

 

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

33

 

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

35

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

36

 

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

36

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

36

 

 

Board’s Role in Oversight of Risk Management

36

 

 

Independent Accountants, Fees and Policies

37

 

 

Particulars of Matters to be Acted Upon at the Annual Meeting

38

 

 

Proposal 1. Election of the Board

38

Proposal 2. Ratification of the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ending December 31, 2017

41

Proposal 3. Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

41

Proposal 4. Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

42

Proposal 5. Amendment to Long-Term Incentive Plan

42

Proposal 6. Approval of an Amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Shares of Authorized Common Stock from 550,000,000 to 800,000,000 Shares

48

 

 

Householding of Proxy Materials

50

 

 

Proposals for 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

50

 

 

Additional Information

50

 

 

Annex A: Proposed Amendment to the Gastar Exploration Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan

51

 

 

 

i


 

Gastar Exploration Inc.

1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650

Houston, Texas 77010

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS,

THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Why am I receiving these proxy materials?

The Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting because you owned shares of common stock at the close of business on May 10, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”), and are therefore entitled to notice regarding the Annual Meeting, and to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement, along with a proxy card, is being mailed to stockholders on or about May 26, 2017. We have also made these materials available to you free of charge on the Internet. This Proxy Statement summarizes the information that you need to know in order to cast your vote at the Annual Meeting. As a stockholder, your vote is very important and the Board strongly encourages you to exercise your right to vote. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting in person to vote your shares of common stock, and we encourage you to vote even if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you may vote by Internet or by signing and returning the attached proxy card in the envelope provided. See “How do I vote my shares of common stock?” below.  

When and where will the Annual Meeting be held?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 27, 2017, 10:00 a.m., central time, at the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar Street, Houston, Texas 77010.

Who is soliciting my proxy?

The Board is soliciting your proxy to vote on all matters scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting, whether or not you attend in person. By completing and returning the proxy card or by casting your vote via the Internet, you are authorizing the proxy holders to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, as you have instructed.

On what matters will I be voting?

At the Annual Meeting, our common stockholders will be asked:

1.

To elect the six (6) nominees named in this Proxy Statement members of the Board to serve until our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders and their successors are elected and qualified;

2.

To ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017;

3.

To approve on a non-binding advisory basis the compensation of our named executive officers (“Named Executive Officers”);

4.  To approve on a non-binding advisory basis the frequency (every one, two or three years) with which an advisory vote on compensation of our Named Executive Officers should be held;

5.  To approve an amendment to the Gastar Exploration Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) to increase the number of shares available for awards under the plan as well as certain other additional changes;

6.

To approve an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 550,000,000 to 800,000,000 shares; and

7.

To transact any such other business as may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

A proxy that is properly completed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy.  If you properly complete and return a proxy, but do not indicate any contrary voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations, which are listed below.  If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted at the discretion of the holders of the proxy.  Such persons intend to vote on any such other matter in accordance with their best judgment.  We do not expect any matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the items outlined above.

1

 


 

In addition, our executive manag ement will report on our business and financial performance during fiscal year 2016 and respond to your questions.

How does the Board recommend that I cast my vote?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote:

FOR the election to the Board of each of the six (6) nominees for director;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017;

FOR the approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers;

FOR an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers to be held every one year;

FOR the approval of an amendment to the Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for awards under the plan; and

FOR the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 550,000,000 shares to 800,000,000 shares.

How many votes may I cast?

Each share of common stock that you own on the Record Date entitles you to cast one vote on each matter that is properly brought before the Annual Meeting.

How many votes can be cast by all common stockholders?

As of the Record Date, there were 211,903,583 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Is my vote important?

Your vote is important regardless of how many shares of common stock that you own. Please take the time to vote. Please read the instructions below, choose the way to vote that is easiest and most convenient for you and cast your vote as soon as possible.

Can I vote if my shares are held in “street name”?

If your shares of common stock are held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of the shares of common stock held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares of common stock and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares. In order to vote your shares of common stock, you will need to follow the directions your broker, bank or other nominee provides you.

What are broker non-votes and abstentions?

If you hold your shares of common stock in “street name,” you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee describing how to vote your shares. If you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares, they may vote your shares as they decide as to each matter for which they have discretionary authority under the rules of the NYSE MKT LLC (“NYSE MKT”).

There are also non-discretionary matters for which brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretionary authority to vote unless they receive timely instructions from you. When a broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretion to vote on a particular matter and you have not given timely instructions on how the broker, bank or other nominee should vote your shares, a “broker non-vote” results. Although any broker non-vote would be counted as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, it would be treated as not entitled to vote with respect to non-discretionary matters.

2

 


 

If your shares of common stock are held in “street name” and you do not give voting instructions, pursuant to NYSE MKT Company Guide Section 723, the record holder will not be permitted to vote your shares with respect to the election of director nominees, the advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation, the advisory vote regarding the frequency with which an advisory vote to approve Named Executive Offi cer compensation should be held, and the approval of the amendment to the Gastar Exploration Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan, and your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” with respect to this proposal. If your shares are held in “street name” and yo u do not give voting instructions, the record holder will nevertheless be entitled to vote your shares with respect to ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP.

Abstentions occur when stockholders are present at the Annual Meeting but fail to vote or voluntarily withhold their vote for any of the matters upon which the stockholders are voting.  The effect of such abstentions is discussed in more detail by proposition below under the question regarding the required vote.

How many shares of common stock must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary for a valid Annual Meeting. The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is the presence, either in person or by proxy, of holders of not less than one-third (33 1/3%) of the total outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

What vote is required to elect the six (6) directors by the common stockholders and to approve each of the common stockholder proposals discussed in this Proxy Statement?

 

Proposal

  

Vote Required

 

 

To elect the six (6) nominees named in the Proxy Statement as members of the Board to serve until our annual meeting in 2018 or until their successors are qualified and elected.

  

A plurality of the votes cast in person or by proxy.

 

 

To ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017.

  

A majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy.

 

 

To approve on a non-binding advisory basis the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

  

A majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy.

 

 

 

To approve on a non-binding advisory basis the frequency (every one, two or three years) with which an advisory vote on compensation of our Named Executive Officers should be held.

 

The option (one, two or three years) that receives the majority of votes cast by stockholders present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote; provided, however, if no option receives a majority of votes cast, the option that receives the greatest number of votes cast.

 

 

 

To approve an amendment to the Gastar Exploration Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares available for awards under the plan as well as certain other additional changes.

 

A majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy.

 

 

 

To approve an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 550,000,000 shares to 800,000,000 shares.  

 

A majority of the outstanding common stock entitled to vote.

 

As noted above, except with respect to ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP, shares represented by broker non-votes are not considered votes cast.  With respect to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from the election of each nominee.  Votes that are withheld from a director’s election will count toward a quorum but will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of a director.  Also, broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of a director because the number of nominees does not exceed the number of Board positions being voted on.  With respect to the approval of the compensation of Named Executive Officers and the advisory vote on the

3

 


 

fre quency of executive compensation advisory votes, for which the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy is required, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and therefore will not affe ct the outcome of the vote.  With respect to the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP, abstentions are not considered to be votes cast and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote.  With respect to the approval of the amendment to the L ong-Term Incentive Plan and to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.  For purposes of the Amended and Restate d Certificate of Incorporation, any broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal; however, for purposes of the amendment to the Long-Term Incentive Plan, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote.

While the advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation and the advisory vote on the frequency of named executive compensation advisory votes are required by law, the outcome will not be binding on Gastar or the Board, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on, our company or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote on executive compensation when considering future executive compensation decisions.  Likewise, the Board will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote on the frequency of executive compensation advisory vote in making a determination on the frequency at which advisory votes on executive compensation will be included in our proxy statements for future annual meetings.  

How do I vote my shares of common stock?

Stockholders of Record. Stockholders of record may vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of the following methods:

To Vote by Mail. You may vote by completing and signing the proxy card that accompanies this Proxy Statement and promptly mailing it in the enclosed envelope.  The shares of common stock that you own will be voted according to the instructions on the proxy card that you provide.  If you return the proxy card but do not give any instructions on a particular matter described in this Proxy Statement, the shares of common stock that you own will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.  In order to be valid and acted upon at the Annual Meeting, your proxy card must be received by our registrar and transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, Attention: Proxy Department, 6201 15 th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219, at least 24 hours before the time of the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, excluding weekends and holidays.

To Vote by Internet. You may vote online by going to the following Internet address: http://www.proxyvote.com . Please have your proxy card available and follow the instructions to obtain your records and create an electronic ballot. You may use the Internet to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 26, 2017.

To Vote by Telephone.   You may vote by phone by using a touch-tone telephone and calling the following toll free number:  1-800-690-6903.  Please have your proxy card available and follow the instructions to vote.  You may use the phone to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 26, 2017.  

To Vote in Person. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote by delivering your completed proxy card in person or by completing a ballot, which will be available at the Annual Meeting. Attending the Annual Meeting without delivering your completed proxy card or completing a ballot will not count as a vote. Submitting a proxy via mail or by Internet will not prevent you from attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

Street Name Stockholders . Street name stockholders may generally vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of the following methods:

By Mail. You may indicate your vote by completing, signing and dating your voting instruction card or other information forwarded by your broker, bank or other nominee and returning it to such party in the manner specified in such materials.

By Methods Listed on Voting Instruction Form . Please refer to your voting instruction form or other information forwarded by your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you may submit a proxy by telephone or electronically on the Internet, following the instructions on the voting instruction form or other information provided by the record holder.

In Person with a Proxy from the Record Holder . You may vote in person at our Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee. Please consult the voting instruction form or other information sent to you by the record holder to determine how to obtain a legal proxy in order to vote in person at our Annual Meeting.

4

 


 

Can I change my vote after I have mailed my proxy card?

Yes, if you are a stockholder of record, you can revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by:

submitting written notice to that effect or a new proxy to our Corporate Secretary at our registered office at any time up to and including the last business day preceding the day of the Annual Meeting;

submitting written notice to that effect or a new proxy to the chairperson of the Annual Meeting at the Annual Meeting at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting;

voting again through the Internet prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on June 26, 2017;

voting in person at the Annual Meeting; and

in any other manner permitted by law.

If you are a street name stockholder and you vote by proxy, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee in accordance with such entity's procedures. In either case, your attendance at the Annual Meeting alone will not revoke your proxy.

Will any other business be conducted at the Annual Meeting or will other matters be voted on?

At the Annual Meeting, holders of our outstanding Special Voting Preferred Stock, currently consisting of funds managed indirectly by Ares, are entitled to nominate, and voting exclusively and separately as a class will be entitled to elect, two additional directors to our Board, provided that such holders, their permitted subsequent holders and their respective affiliates beneficially own at least 15% of our outstanding common stock.  The holders of Special Voting Preferred Stock have nominated and are expected to elect as directors at the Annual Meeting Ronald D. Scott and Nathan W. Walton.  Messrs. Scott and Walton were appointed to the Board as directors on May 2, 2017.  The required quorum for election of directors by the holders of Special Voting Preferred Stock at the Annual Meeting is the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Special Voting Preferred Stock.  Our Special Voting Preferred Stock does not entitle the holder to vote for other director nominees or on any other matter at the Annual Meeting.

We do not expect any other matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the items discussed in this Proxy Statement. If any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy card, whether you submit your proxy in person, over the Internet or by mail, will exercise their judgment in deciding how to vote, or otherwise act, at the Annual Meeting with respect to that matter or proposal.

May I propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting or nominate individuals to serve as directors?

You may submit proposals for consideration at future annual meetings. See “Proposals for 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” for information regarding the submission of stockholder proposals at next year’s annual meeting.

Where can I find the voting results?

We will report the voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC within four business days of the Annual Meeting.

Who bears the costs of soliciting these proxies?

We will bear the entire cost of the solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this Proxy Statement, the proxy card and the other proxy materials furnished to stockholders.  In addition to this solicitation by mail, certain directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies on our behalf by use of mail, telephone, facsimile, electronic means, in person or otherwise. These persons will not receive any additional compensation for assisting in the solicitation but may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the solicitation.  We will furnish copies of solicitation materials to banks, brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians holding in their names common shares beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. We will reimburse banks and brokers for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the distribution of our proxy materials.

5

 


 

How do I get directions to the Annual Meeting?

For directions to the Annual Meeting, please contact our Corporate Secretary at (713) 739-1800.

 

6

 


 

INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECT ORS, DIRECTOR NOMINEES,

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND MEMBERS OF MANAGEMENT

The Board currently is composed of eight (8) members: Jerry R. Schuyler (Chairman), John H. Cassels, Randolph C. Coley, Stephen A. Holditch, Robert D. Penner, J. Russell Porter, Ronald D. Scott and Nathan W. Walton.

The Nominating & Governance Committee has recommended to the Board, and the Board has nominated Messrs. Schuyler, Cassels, Coley, Holditch, Penner and Porter for re-election by the common stockholders at the Annual Meeting.  Messrs. Scott and Walton have been nominated for election as directors by the holders of our Special Voting Preferred Stock.  Information about each director nominee can be found beginning on page 37 in connection with “Proposal 1. Election of the Board.” Although the Board does not contemplate that any of the director nominees will refuse or be unable to serve, if such a situation arises prior to the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote for the election of such other person(s) as may be nominated by the Board or the Board may reduce the size of the Board.

Biographical information about our executive officers and other members of our management as of May 1, 2017 is set forth below other than our Chief Executive Officer, who also serves as director.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

J. Russell Porter (1)(2)

 

55

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

Michael A. Gerlich (1)

 

62

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Keith R. Blair

 

62

 

Vice President – Geoscience

Henry J. Hansen

 

61

 

Vice President – Land

Trent J. Determann

 

30

 

Vice President – Finance

 

(1)

Messrs. Porter and Gerlich are currently our only “Executive Officers” as such term is defined by the rules promulgated by the SEC.

(2)

For a description of the business background and other information concerning Mr. Porter, see page 37 in connection with “Proposal 1. Election of the Board.”

Michael A. Gerlich joined us in May 2005 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was appointed Corporate Secretary on March 8, 2011 and was promoted to Senior Vice President in June 2013. Mr. Gerlich has more than 36 years of oil and natural gas accounting and finance experience. From 1999 until joining us in 2005, he held various accounting and finance positions at Calpine Natural Gas LP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Calpine Corporation, an independent electric power generation company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. His last position at Calpine Natural Gas LP was Senior Vice President – Accounting and Finance for natural gas and oil operations of the wholly-owned subsidiary. From 1994 until 1999, Mr. Gerlich served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sheridan Energy, Inc., an independent natural gas and oil exploration company traded on the NASDAQ, which was acquired in 1999 by Calpine Corporation. Over a 12-year period prior to joining Sheridan Energy, Inc., Mr. Gerlich held various accounting and finance positions with Trinity Resources, Ltd., an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company, with his last position being Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Gerlich was also with the auditing firm of Deloitte LLP, where the focus of his practice was with energy related clients. Mr. Gerlich served as a member of the board of directors and as the Audit Committee Chairman for Petropoint Energy Partners LP (“Petropoint”), a private upstream oil and gas limited partnership, from November 2012 until Petropoint’s property sale and dissolution in August 2014. Mr. Gerlich is a Certified Public Accountant and graduated with honors from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.

Keith R. Blair joined us in August 2005 as a Senior Staff Geologist and was promoted to Vice President Geoscience in 2008. Mr. Blair has more than 36 years of oil and natural gas experience. He has extensive working knowledge of oil and natural gas basins in Colorado, New Mexico, East Texas, West Virginia/Pennsylvania, Offshore Gulf of Mexico and the Texas/Louisiana Gulf Coast. Prior to joining us, from 1999 until 2005, he was an independent exploration geologist. From 1995 until 1999, Mr. Blair was a Senior Geophysicist at Schlumberger Limited. Prior to 1995, he held an Exploration Manager/Supervisor position at ConocoPhillips for 14 years. He began his career as a well logging engineer with Halliburton Company. Mr. Blair graduated from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology.

Henry J. Hansen joined us in September 2005 as Vice President of Land. Mr. Hansen has more than 35 years of land management experience. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hansen was Rocky Mountain Land Manager with El Paso Corporation, an oil and natural gas exploration, production and pipeline company, from 1999 until January 2003. From January 2003 until June 2004, he worked as an independent land consultant. Mr. Hansen returned to El Paso Corporation in June 2004, where he was a senior landman until joining us in September 2005. Mr. Hansen graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor of Business Administration in Petroleum Management.

7

 


 

Trent J. Determann joined us in August 2014 and was promoted to Vice President Finance in November 2016.  Prior to joining Gastar, Mr. Determan n was Manager Financial Planning and Strategy for Petropoint, a private upstream oil and gas limited partnership formed to acquire and exploit mature conventional onshore oil and gas assets, from October 2012 until Petropoint’s sale and dissolution in Au gust 2014.  Prior to Petropoint, Mr. Determann worked for the energy group of RBC Capital Markets Global Investment Banking Division from October 2010 to October 2012.  Mr. Determann began his career as an analyst in the Commercial Banking Group of BBVA Co mpass.  Mr. Determann graduated from Louisiana State University with a Bachelor of Science in Finance.

There are no family relationships between our Named Executive Officers, those members of management noted above and our directors.

8

 


 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information about the Board

The Board believes that good corporate governance improves corporate performance and benefits all stockholders. This section sets out our approach to corporate governance and addresses our compliance with NYSE MKT listing requirements.

Mandate of the Board

The Board is responsible for managing our business affairs. The primary responsibility of the Board is to promote our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. This responsibility includes: (i) approving annual capital expenditure budgets and general and administrative expense budgets and reviewing fundamental operating, financial and other corporate plans, strategies and objectives; (ii) outlining key operating parameters including debt levels and ratios; (iii) evaluating our performance and the performance of our senior management; (iv) determining, evaluating and fixing the compensation of executive officers; (v) adopting policies of corporate governance and conduct; (vi) considering risk management matters; (vii) reviewing the process of providing appropriate financial and operational information to stockholders and the public generally; and (viii) evaluating the overall effectiveness of the Board. The Board explicitly acknowledges its responsibility for our stewardship. The Board reviews with management matters of strategic planning, business risk identification, succession planning, communications policy and integrity of internal control and management information systems. The Board fulfills its responsibilities through regular and special meetings.

Current Members of the Board and Director Independence

The Board currently is comprised of eight (8) members. The Board has determined that each member of the Board, with the exception of Mr. Porter, does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is independent within the meaning of the NYSE MKT listing requirements. Mr. Porter, as our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not considered to be independent. Further, the Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Reserves Review Committee does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is independent within the meaning of the NYSE MKT listing requirements.

The following sets forth the current committee memberships of our eight (8) directors: 

 

Name

 

Audit

Committee

 

 

Compensation

Committee

 

 

Reserves

Review

Committee

 

 

Nominating   &

Governance

Committee

 

J. Russell Porter, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John H. Cassels, Director

 

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Randolph C. Coley, Director

 

 

X

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman

 

Stephen A. Holditch, Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman

 

 

 

X

 

Robert D. Penner, Director

 

 

Chairman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Jerry R. Schuyler, Director

 

 

 

 

 

Chairman

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Ronald D. Scott, Director (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Nathan W. Walton, Director (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

(1)

Messrs. Scott and Walton were appointed to the Board and the indicated committees on May 2, 2017.    

 

Board and Committee Meetings

The Board meets a minimum of four (4) times per year. In addition, the Board meets at such other times as may be required if it is not possible to deal with our business at a regularly scheduled quarterly meeting.

The Board facilitates its independent supervision over management in a number of ways, including by holding regular meetings at which members of management and non-independent directors are not in attendance and by retaining independent consultants where it deems necessary.

Under the terms of our Special Voting Preferred Stock, holders of such stock have the option and right (but not the obligation) to designate one director elected by class vote of such holders (a “Preferred Director”) to serve on one or more committees of the Board without limitation, provided that such Preferred Director meets the applicable independence requirements and any qualification

9

 


 

requirements applicable to such committee. Messrs. Scott and Walton have been nominated as Preferred Directors by holders of the Special Voting Preferred Stock and are expected to be elec ted as Preferred Directors at the Annual Meeting.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, Messrs. Porter, Cassels, Coley, Holditch, Penner and Schuyler attended 100% of all meetings held by the Board during the time in which they were a member of the Board.     

The following table sets forth the number of Board and committee meetings held during 2016 and the attendance of each director during the time in which he was a member of the Board and of a committee: 

 

Director

 

Board

Meetings

 

Audit

Committee

 

Compensation

Committee

 

Reserves

Review

Committee

 

Nominating &

Governance

Committee

J. Russell Porter

 

11 of 11

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

John H. Cassels

 

11 of 11

 

4 of 4

 

4 of 4

 

2 of 2

 

n/a

Randolph C. Coley

 

11 of 11

 

4 of 4

 

2 of 2

 

n/a

 

2 of 2

Stephen A. Holditch

 

11 of 11

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

2 of 2

 

2 of 2

Robert D. Penner

 

11 of 11

 

4 of 4

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

2 of 2

Jerry R. Schuyler

 

11 of 11

 

n/a

 

3 of 4

 

2 of 2

 

n/a

Board Composition and Leadership Structure

Mr. Schuyler was appointed Chairman of the Board effective November 16, 2015. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Porter, serves as a director.

The Board has determined that the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be separated at this time. The Board determined that the separation of these roles would maximize management’s efficiency and further our ongoing efforts to maintain strong corporate governance and assure stockholder representation and the independent, objective and effective oversight of management. Separating these positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing guidance to and oversight of management. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, however, provide that each year the Nominating & Governance Committee will review whether this policy is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board specifically reserves the right to vest the responsibilities of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in the same or different individuals.

Orientation and Continuing Education

When new directors are appointed, they receive orientation, commensurate with their previous experience, on our properties, business, operations and industry and on the responsibilities of directors. Board meetings may also include presentations by our management and employees to give the directors additional insight into our business. New directors are provided with access to our publicly-filed documents, technical reports and internal financial information and copies of all of the minutes of Board and committee meetings and corporate governance materials are made available to director nominees. Directors are encouraged to ask questions and communicate with management, auditors and technical consultants to keep themselves current with industry trends and developments and changes in legislation.

Nomination of Directors

The Board has delegated the responsibility of identifying new director candidates to the Nominating & Governance Committee. The process and responsibility of the Nominating & Governance Committee is set forth on page 14 under the heading “Nominating & Governance Committee.”  The current holders of our Special Voting Preferred Stock have the right to nominate and elect at each Annual Meeting up to two directors designated by them to serve on the Board.

Compensation

The Board has delegated the responsibility of determining compensation strategies and recommending the forms and amounts of compensation for directors, officers, consultants and employees to the Compensation Committee. Please refer to the disclosure on page 13 under the heading “Compensation Committee.”  

10

 


 

Board Evaluations/Assessments

We have established procedures and surveys for assessing and evaluating the performance of the Board. The surveys completed by each director are summarized and discussed by the Board as a whole with the objective of making appropriate changes to the Board’s policies or procedures to ensure greater Board effectiveness.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for all directors, officers and other employees. A copy of our Code of Conduct and Ethics is available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com . A copy of our Code of Conduct and Ethics will also be provided to any person without charge, upon request. Such requests should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at 1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650, Houston, Texas 77010.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders or other interested parties may send communications to the Board, the Chairman of the Board, any committee of the Board or any other director in particular, by writing to our Corporate Secretary at 1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650, Houston, Texas 77010. Stockholders and any other interested parties should mark the envelope containing each communication as “Stockholder Communication with Directors” and clearly identify the intended recipient(s) of the communication. Our Corporate Secretary will review each communication received from stockholders and other interested parties and will forward the communication, as expeditiously as reasonably practicable, to the addressees if: (1) the communication complies with the requirements of any applicable policy adopted by the Board relating to the subject matter of the communication; and (2) the communication falls within the scope of matters generally considered by the Board. To the extent the subject matter of a communication relates to matters that have been delegated by the Board to a committee or to an executive officer of the Company, our Corporate Secretary may forward the communication to the executive officer or chairman of the committee to which the matter has been delegated.

Comments or complaints relating to our accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee has procedures for (i) receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; (ii) receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding potential violations of applicable laws, rules and regulations or of our codes, policies and procedures; and (iii) the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. These “whistleblower” policies and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee are available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com .

Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Although all directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders, we do not have a formal policy with regards to director attendance. In 2016, all directors at the time the meeting was held attended our annual meeting of stockholders.

 

 

11

 


 

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board has designated a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Reserves Review Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee. Each committee has a written charter that has been approved by the Board, which sets forth guidance on the role of the chairman of such committee and the roles and responsibilities of the committee as a whole. Our Board has also adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics and other governance policies. Each such document is available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com . A copy of each such document will be provided to any person without charge, upon request. Such requests should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at 1331 Lamar Street, Suite 650, Houston, Texas 77010.

Audit Committee

Composition

The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Penner (Chairman), Cassels and Coley, each of whom the Board has determined to be independent under the rules of the NYSE MKT, including the rules specific to audit committee members, and Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the rules promulgated by the SEC thereunder. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and that Mr. Penner is an “audit committee financial expert,” within the meaning proscribed by the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. He became a member of the Board effective July 16, 2007. Mr. Penner is a retired senior partner with KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), whose career of advising public and private clients on tax and accounting matters has spanned more than 41 years. The Audit Committee met four (4) times during 2016.

In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee examines and reviews, on behalf of the Board, internal financial controls, financial and accounting policies and practices, the form and content of financial reports and statements and the work of the external auditors. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring, overseeing and terminating the independent registered public accounting firm and determining the compensation of such accountants. The Chief Financial Officer attends the meetings of the Audit Committee by invitation.

Audit Committee Charter

The Audit Committee has performed its annual review and assessment of the Audit Committee charter. A copy of the charter for the Audit Committee is available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com .

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing matters relating to our accounting and financial reporting practices, the adequacy of its internal controls and the quality and integrity of its financial statements, and is responsible for selecting and retaining the independent auditors. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are more fully described in its charter. Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements, and the independent auditors are responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Audit Committee does not provide any expert or special assurance as to our financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent auditors’ work. The Audit Committee met four (4) times during the year ended December 31, 2016.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed our audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and discussed them with management and BDO USA, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with BDO USA, LLP all matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 1301.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from BDO USA, LLP required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with BDO USA, LLP its independence from us and our management.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that our audited financial statements be included in our 2016 Annual Report.

 

Gastar Exploration Inc.

Audit Committee

/s/ Robert D. Penner, Chairman

/s/ John H. Cassels

/s/ Randolph C. Coley

12

 


 

 

This report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically request that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

*    *    *

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Schuyler (Chairman), Cassels and Coley, each of whom the Board has determined to be independent according to the definition of independence used in the NYSE MKT listing standards, including the rules specific to audit committee members. The Compensation Committee met four (4) times during 2016.

The aim of the Compensation Committee is to award and compensate our officers and employees in a manner which provides incentives for the enhancement of stockholder value, for the successful implementation of our business plan and for continuous improvement in corporate and personal performance. The compensation program is based on a pay-for-performance philosophy and consists of three components: base salary, annual incentive (bonus) paid in cash and long-term equity based incentives.

The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends the compensation philosophy and guidelines for us, including recommendations to the Board for its consideration and approval of annual salary, incentive policies and programs, material new benefit programs and material changes to existing benefit programs.

On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee reviews the cash compensation, performance and overall compensation package for each executive officer. It then submits to the Board recommendations with respect to the base salary, bonus and participation in long-term incentive compensation arrangements for each executive officer. In conducting its review, the Compensation Committee was satisfied that all recommendations complied with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy and guidelines.  The Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain, compensate, direct, oversee and terminate outside counsel, compensation consultants and other advisors hired to assist the Compensation Committee.  In determining 2016 annual incentive cash awards, the Compensation Committee retained Longnecker & Associates (“L&A”), a company that monitors executive and board compensation, equity grants and award policies and corporate compensation practices, as its independent compensation consultant for matters related to executive and non-management director compensation.  The Compensation Committee used compensation data provided by L&A.  In selecting L&A as its independent compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee assessed the independence of L&A pursuant to SEC rules and considered, among other things, whether L&A provides any other services to us, the fees paid by us to L&A as a percentage of L&A’s total revenues, the policies of L&A that are designed to prevent any conflict of interest between L&A, the Compensation Committee and us, any personal or business relationship between L&A and a member of the Compensation Committee or one of our executive officers and whether L&A owned any shares of our common stock.  In addition to the foregoing, the Compensation Committee received an independence letter from L&A, as well as other documentation addressing the firm’s independence.  L&A reports exclusively to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any additional services to us.  The Compensation Committee has discussed these considerations and has concluded that L&A is independent and that we do not have any conflicts of interest with L&A.  

The Compensation Committee may delegate to its chairman, any one of its members or any subcommittee it may form the responsibility and authority for any particular matter, as it deems appropriate from time to time under the circumstances. In particular, the Compensation Committee may delegate the approval of award grants and other transactions and responsibilities regarding the administration of compensatory programs to a subcommittee consisting solely of members of the Compensation Committee who are (a) “Non-Employee Directors” for the purposes of Rule 16b-3of the Exchange Act and/or (b) “outside directors” for the purposes of Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”). However, subcommittees shall not have the authority to engage independent legal counsel and other experts and advisors unless expressly granted such authority by the Compensation Committee.

For more information on the role of the Compensation Committee and the use of independent consulting firms and market data, see “Executive Compensation” below.

A copy of the charter for the Compensation Committee is available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com.

13

 


 

Reserves Review Committee

The Reserves Review Committee currently consists of Messrs. Holditch (Chairman), Cassels, Schuyler and Scott. The Reserves Review Committee met two (2) times during 2016. Its responsibilities include:

Reviewing our procedures for providing information to the independent qualified reserve evaluator;

Participating annually in meetings with the independent qualified reserve evaluator to determine whether there are any restrictions that could affect the ability of the evaluator to report without reservation; and

Reviewing our reserve data with the independent qualified reserve evaluator.

A copy of the charter for the Reserves Review Committee is available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com.

Nominating & Governance Committee

The Nominating & Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Coley (Chairman), Holditch, Penner and Walton, each of whom the Board has determined to be independent under the definition of independence used in the NYSE MKT listing standards. The Nominating & Governance Committee met two (2) times during 2016.

With respect to governance activities, the Nominating & Governance Committee has the responsibility of monitoring our overall approach to corporate governance issues, which include:

Advising the Board and making recommendations regarding appropriate corporate governance practices and assisting the Board in implementing those practices;

Assisting the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board and recommending director nominees to the Board for election at the annual meetings of stockholders or for appointment to fill vacancies on the Board;

Advising the Board about the appropriate composition of the Board and its committees;

Leading the Board in the annual performance review of the Board and its committees;

Directing all matters relating to the succession of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer; and

Performing such other functions as the Board may assign from time to time.

With respect to nominations, the Nominating & Governance Committee assists the Board in ensuring that the Board is comprised of individuals who are best able to discharge the responsibilities of directors, having an understanding of our industry, stage of growth, the law and the highest standards of governance. The tasks and responsibilities are defined in the charter of the Nominating & Governance Committee, which was approved by the Board.

Prior to recommending to the Board that an existing director be nominated for election as a director at the annual meeting of stockholders, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers and reviews the director’s: (i) board and committee meeting attendance and performance; (ii) length of Board service; (iii) personal and professional integrity, including commitment to our core values; (iv) experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the Board; and (v) independence under applicable standards.

In the event that a vacancy on the Board arises, the Nominating & Governance Committee seeks and identifies a qualified director nominee to be recommended to the Board for either appointment by the Board to serve the remainder of the term of the director position that is vacant or election at the next annual meeting of stockholders. To identify such a nominee, the Committee solicits recommendations from existing directors and senior management. These recommendations are considered by the Nominating & Governance Committee along with any recommendations that have been received from stockholders. The Nominating & Governance Committee may, in its discretion, retain a search firm to provide additional candidates. Prior to recommending to the Board that a person be elected to fill a vacancy on the Board, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers and reviews the candidate's: (i) relevant skills and experience; (ii) independence under applicable standards; (iii) business judgment; (iv) service on boards of directors of other companies; (v) personal and professional integrity, including commitment to the Company’s core values; (vi) openness and ability to work as part of a team; (vii) willingness to commit the required time to serve as a Board member; and (viii) familiarity with the Company and its industry. The Nominating & Governance Committee also considers the optimal enhancement of the current mix of talent and experience on the Board.

14

 


 

The Nominating & Governance Committee treats recommendations for directors that are received from stockholders equally with recommendations received from any other source. Although we do not have a policy regarding the consideration of diversity in assessing a director nominee, the Board considers the individual’s background, experie nce and competencies that the Board desires to have represented among its members.

On March 12, 2014, we entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Kleinheinz Capital Partners, Inc., Global Undervalued Securities Master Fund, L.P., John B. Kleinheinz and Fred N. Reynolds (collectively, the “Kleinheinz Group”). The Settlement Agreement provided that we would expand our Board from five to seven members and appoint two directors agreeable to both us and the Kleinheinz Group (the “Mutually Agreed Directors”). The Mutually Agreed Directors Messrs. Holditch and Schuyler were appointed after the 2014 Annual Meeting. For the term of the Settlement Agreement the Kleinheinz Group has agreed to vote the shares it beneficially owns in favor of the director candidates that are nominated by our Board.

The Settlement Agreement terminated 60 days prior to the expiration of the Company’s advance notice period for the nomination of directors and submission of stockholder proposals for the Annual Meeting.

In March 2017, the Nominating & Governance Committee considered and approved our six (6) director nominees to be proposed for election by holders of our common stock. Our full Board at such time, including our non-independent director, then considered and approved the nominees recommended by the Nominating & Governance Committee.

A copy of the charter for the Nominating & Governance Committee is available free of charge on our website at www.gastar.com.

 

 

15

 


 

EXECUTIVE C OMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides information regarding the compensation paid to J. Russell Porter, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and paid to Michael A. Gerlich, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). These individuals are referred to as “Named Executive Officers.” Messrs. Porter and Gerlich are our only Named Executive Officers as they were our only “Executive Officers,” as such term is defined by the rules promulgated by the SEC, during 2016.  On February 1, 2016, Michael McCown, our former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, retired and thus for 2016, was not considered in the compensation decisions described in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis but would be considered a Named Executive Officer and is accordingly included in the tabular disclosures below where applicable.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is designed to provide compensation at a level necessary to retain talented and experienced executives and to motivate them to achieve both short-term and long-term corporate goals that enhance stockholder value. Consistent with this philosophy, the following are the key objectives of our compensation program.

Attract, Motivate and Retain Key Employees.  Our executive compensation program is shaped by the competitive market for management talent in the independent natural gas and oil exploration and production industry. We believe our executive compensation should be comparable to that of the companies with which we compete for talent. Our goal is to provide compensation and benefits at levels that attract, motivate and retain superior executive talent for the long-term.

Stockholder Interest Alignment.  One of the objectives of our executive compensation program is to ensure that an appropriate relationship exists between executive pay, our financial performance and the creation of stockholder value. We believe that linking executive compensation to corporate performance results in a better alignment of compensation with corporate goals and stockholder interests. Our compensation program aligns pay to performance by making a substantial portion of total executive compensation variable, or “at-risk,” through an annual bonus program based on our performance goals and the granting of long-term incentive equity awards, which have included restricted common shares, performance-based units and stock options. As performance goals are met, not met or exceeded, executives are rewarded commensurately.

Determination of Executive Compensation

Role of the Compensation Committee.  Executive compensation is the responsibility of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. John H. Cassels, Randolph C. Coley and Jerry R. Schuyler are members of the Board and the current members of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Schuyler is the current Compensation Committee Chairman. Each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies as an independent director under the NYSE MKT listing standards and under the Exchange Act. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available to stockholders on our website at www.gastar.com.

Philosophy of the Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee’s philosophy is strongly driven by a “Pay for Performance” compensation approach that focuses on enhancing stockholder value. As described in greater detail below, the Compensation Committee presently targets total compensation, which consists of base salary, annual incentive awards and long-term stock awards at the market 50th percentile of its peer group as defined by an independent third party compensation consultant. If management’s efforts cause the Company’s results to materially exceed or lag behind the results of its peer group, total compensation may be adjusted upward or downward from the market 50th percentile. The Compensation Committee believes that this approach awards and compensates our Named Executive Officers in a manner that fairly and reasonably provides incentives for the enhancement of stockholder value, the successful implementation of our business plan and the continuous improvement in corporate and personal performance.

During 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the cash compensation, performance and overall compensation package for each Named Executive Officer. It then submitted to the Board recommendations with respect to the salary, bonus and participation in equity-based compensation arrangements for each Named Executive Officer. In conducting its review of management’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee was satisfied that all recommendations complied with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy and guidelines.

16

 


 

Interaction Between the Compensation Committee and Management.  Our CEO plays an important role in the executive compensation process and is closely involved in assessing the performance of our CFO, who was our only other Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2016. He also makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding base salary, bonus targets, and performance goals established for the annual incentive plan, as well as weighting and equity compensation for our CFO. Our CEO’s recommendations are based on his review of any market or p eer group analysis data provided by our compensation consultant, an assessment of our CFO’s responsibilities and individual performance, our Company performance and the compensation that companies in our peer group pay their executives in comparable positi ons. Our CFO also plays an important role in our executive compensation process. He makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the structure of the annual cash bonus awards program and the appropriate performance threshold, target and ma ximum opportunities of the program. These recommendations are drawn from his previous work experience, informal discussions with other CEOs and with CFOs and review of publicly filed information of other similarly-sized natural gas and oil companies regard ing their bonus programs.

Role of Compensation Consultant and Market Analysis.  For 2016, the Compensation Committee utilized 2015 peer company data and 2016 published survey sources supplied by L&A in reviewing and making certain compensation decisions. For the purposes of its report, L&A’s engagement objectives included:

 

Reviewing total direct compensation (base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives) for the Named Executive Officers;

 

Assessing the market competitiveness of executive compensation as compared to our peer group and published surveys of other companies in the oil and natural gas industry with revenues and capital assets comparable to our revenue and capital assets; and

 

Providing conclusions and recommending considerations for current total direct compensation packages for our Named Executive Officers.

L&A’s approach to this study was based upon its experience in the design of executive compensation programs in the energy industry and external market data procured from the marketplace in which we compete for top-level talent. This experience, along with its competitive market analysis, allowed L&A to make compensation recommendations that provide us with information to attract, retain, and motivate top-level executive talent. Additionally, L&A’s recommendations were tailored to balance external market data and our internal environment to ensure fiscal responsibility.

Specifically, L&A’s approach was to gather compensation data from (a) public peer companies and (b) published salary surveys and to conduct a market comparison analysis of the gathered data. Prior to beginning its analysis, L&A reviewed the composition of our peer group to assess the continued appropriateness of the group and ensure that the included companies were still relevant for comparative purposes. Based on its review, L&A recommended that companies that had been acquired or delisted, as well as companies whose geographic scope and nature of operations differed from ours be removed to ensure that the peer group was comprised of companies with a similar production profile, revenue base and size, as measured by market capitalization. The updated peer group was approved by the Compensation Committee as representative of the sector in which we operate. Next, L&A analyzed current total direct compensation (base salary, plus annual incentives, plus long-term incentives), as compared to the updated peer group and published survey data based on industry, size and performance. This was followed by developing conclusions and recommending considerations, which were reported to the Compensation Committee.

Companies reviewed by L&A (the “Peer Group”) included:

Abraxas Petroleum Corp.

Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.

Comstock Resources Inc.

Contango Oil & Gas Co.

Earthstone Energy, Inc.

Eclipse Resources Corp.

Evolution Petroleum Corp.

Jones Energy, Inc.

Panhandle Oil and Gas Inc.

PetroQuest Energy Inc.

Rex Energy Corporation

Synergy Resources Corp.

17

 


 

Based upon 2015 comparative pay information of our Peer Group developed by L&A and published survey data, the Compensation Committee determined that the Named Executive Officers’ (a) 2016 base salaries were 8% and 2% above the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group for the CEO and CFO, respectively, (b) 2016 total cash compensation (base salary, plus the annual cash incentive award) was 8% and 13% above the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group for the CEO and CFO, respectively, (c) 2016 long-term equity awards were 18% and 10% below the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group for the CEO and CFO, respectively, and (d) 2016 total direct compensation (base salary, plus the annual cash incentive award, plus equity incentive awards) was 3% and 5% above the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group for the CEO and CFO, respectively. Based upon thes e findings, the Compensation Committee believes that the individual pay components and total direct compensation levels of the Named Executive Officers in 2016 approximated competitive market levels.

Though we review information regarding the compensation practices of our Peer Group of companies and the survey data just discussed, individual compensation decisions for our CFO are subject to upward or downward adjustment, based on the recommendations of our CEO and a number of factors related to both corporate and individual performance. We use the data regarding the pay practices of companies in our Peer Group as a reference point and as a guide to competitiveness and reasonableness, but we do not adhere to rigid targets, based upon the compensation components of employees at companies within that group. Our present objective is to maintain total direct compensation, consisting of base salary, performance-based cash compensation and equity awards, in proximity to the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group. However, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to adjust an award upward or downward to account for individual achievement in the last fiscal year, the requirements of a particular position, and market competitiveness for a particular individual’s skills and services, among other factors.

L&A also reviewed and provided recommended considerations to the Compensation Committee on the Company's long-term incentive plan, including the amount of long-term incentives to provide the Named Executive Officers and the form in which those long-term incentive grants were provided to the Named Executive Officers.

Compensation for our Named Executive Officers and Rationale

Base Salary.  Base salary represents the fixed element of the Named Executive Officers’ cash compensation. The base salary reflects results of individual negotiations, economic consideration for each individual’s level of responsibility, expertise, skills, knowledge, experience and performance and reasonable comparability of similar executive base salaries for executives employed by companies in our Peer Group. Since 2015, the Compensation Committee has not adjusted the base salary amounts for Messrs. Porter and Gerlich from the amounts agreed upon in 2015. Messrs. Porter and Gerlich’s 2016 base salaries were greater than the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group by 8% and 2%, respectively.  The following table sets forth base salary information for our Named Executive Officers for the periods presented:

 

 

 

Base Salary

 

Name and Principal Position

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

J. Russell Porter, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

$

550,000

 

 

$

550,000

 

 

$

535,000

 

Michael A. Gerlich, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

312,000

 

Michael McCown, Former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (1)

 

$

350,000

 

 

$

350,000

 

 

$

312,000

 

 

(1)

Mr. McCown retired on February 1, 2016 and only received a pro rata portion of his base salary for such year.  

 

Annual Cash Incentive Awards.  Our annual cash incentive awards reflect our philosophy to reward performance.  Historically, these awards provided our Named Executive Officers with an opportunity to earn an annual cash bonus based on pre-established operational and financial performance targets and an evaluation of individual performance.  In response to a volatile industry environment and retention concerns with regard to our key talent, the normal annual cash incentive award program for 2016 was replaced with an employee retention award program that provided cash awards to our CEO and CFO which were not dependent upon the usual corporate performance metrics.  The 2016 award values for our CEO and CFO were equal to 100% of their respective base salary amounts. For 2016, the Compensation Committee approved an $875,000 total management cash bonus pool for our Named Executive Officers, which was based on the sum of each of our Named Executive Officer's 2016 “target bonus” opportunity expressed as a percentage of the Named Executive Officer’s base salary.  Historically, the bonus pool was accrued throughout the year, and bonuses are normally paid out early in the following year.  However, the 2016 employee retention awards were paid out in equal installments over five quarters beginning in April 2016 with the last payment made April 2017.  For 2016, the annual cash incentive awards for Messrs. Porter and Gerlich were equal to and 20% above the market 50th percentile of our Peer Group, respectively. We plan to resume the normal annual cash incentive award program for 2017 based on specific operational and financial performance targets.

18

 


 

At the beginning of each year, and as part of our annual budgeting process, specific operational and financial target criteria are established by the Compensation Committee.  However, given the Compensation Committee’s election to implement the employee retention award program, the specific operational and financial target criteria used historically were not used.

Prior to 2016, the Compensation Committee analyzed the relative importance of each of the target criteria to our business strategy for the upcoming year to develop the appropriate target criteria and their respective weightings. Each criterion is given a certain weighting.  In the past, 30% of the potential bonus opportunity was contingent on the achievement of specific operational factors, 20% contingent on the achievement of specific financial performance factors and 50% contingent on the achievement of additional per share operational targets and a specific market factor.  During the year in which an annual incentive award program is used, the Company’s operational and financial performance is measured against the criteria.  Market performance is measured at year-end. Judgments that the criteria are being met or not being met may lead to an increase in the pool and an adjustment in the bonus accrual. If threshold targets are not met with respect to a criterion, then the portion of the bonus allocable to that criterion is not paid.  At the end of the year, an approved bonus pool is calculated based on the bonus pool criteria accomplishments.  The amount of the calculated bonus pool is subject to adjustment and final approval by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee’s policy is not to award bonuses if performance targets are not met. The Board, however, maintains the ability to award discretionary bonuses if warranted. Pursuant to Mr. Porter’s employment agreement, Mr. Porter is guaranteed a minimum bonus equal to 20% of his annual base salary.

In 2017, the Company expects to continue determining annual cash incentive award amounts based on operational and financial target criteria established by the Compensation Committee.  The 2017 criterion are expected to be materially similar to those used in 2015 as follows:

 

Goal

Target average annual production (MBoe/d)

Target proved reserves additions (MBoe)

Average finding costs ($/Boe)

Average controllable lifting costs ($/Boe)

Drilling capital efficiency ($/Boe)

Operating cash flow ($ in millions)

Operating cash flow per share

Production per share (Boe)

Reserves per share (Boe)

 

   Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation.  We believe that stock-based compensation is the most effective means of linking compensation provided to our Named Executive Officers with long-term operational success and increases in stockholder value. The Board has discretionary authority to determine granting and vesting periods of stock option, restricted common share and performance based unit grants. We use stock-based compensation as a long-term vehicle for compensation because we believe:

 

Stock-based compensation aligns the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of the stockholders by providing equity participation to our Named Executive Officers; and

 

The vesting period incorporated into stock-based compensation fosters a longer-term perspective necessary for executive retention, stability and continuity.

During 2016, the stock-based compensation granted to our Named Executive Officers consisted of a combination of restricted shares and performance-based units (“PBUs”). The 2016 grants of restricted common shares vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, a vesting period that the Compensation Committee believes is an appropriate balance between longer-term incentives coupled with an element of shorter term reward.  The 2016 grants of PBUs will vest and be measured in full following completion of a three-year period.  The PBUs represent a contractual right to receive shares of the Company’s common stock, an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of shares of the Company’s common stock and cash as of the date of settlement based on the number of PBUs to be settled.  Previous grants of PBUs have been settled in shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting.  The settlement of PBUs may range from 0% to 200% of the targeted number of PBUs stated in the agreement contingent upon the achievement of certain share price appreciation targets as compared to a peer group index, specifically the iShares Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index Fund (NYSEARCA:IEO). The PBUs granted prior to 2015 vested equally and settlement was determined annually over a three-

19

 


 

year period. Any PBUs not vested at each measurement date expire. The Compensation Committee adheres to our policy of only granting stock-based compensation grants during open trading windows.  The following table sets forth criteria for determination of earne d PBUs for the 2016 grant:

Performance Delta (1)

 

Payout as a % of the Number of Initial PBUs for which Measurement Date is Occurring

 

 

Payout if Share Price Appreciation During the Period is Not Positive

 

30 or Greater

 

 

200%

 

 

 

100%

 

25

 

 

180%

 

 

 

90%

 

20

 

 

160%

 

 

 

80%

 

15

 

 

140%

 

 

 

70%

 

10

 

 

120%

 

 

 

60%

 

0

 

 

100%

 

 

 

50%

 

-5

 

 

75%

 

 

 

38%

 

-10

 

 

50%

 

 

 

25%

 

Less than -10.01

 

 

0%

 

 

 

0%

 

 

(1)

Equal to the difference between the share price appreciation of the Company and the share price appreciation of the peer group index for the period beginning on the first day of the performance period and ending at the end of the applicable measurement date.

 

In 2016, Messrs. Porter and Gerlich received restricted common share grants of 404,412 shares and 191,176 shares, respectively.  In addition to restricted common shares, Messrs. Porter and Gerlich received PBU grants of 404,412 units and 191,176 units, respectively. The combined fair values of these grants calculated to be 207% and 165% of Messrs. Porter and Gerlich’s base salaries, respectively, which placed Messrs. Porter and Gerlich 18% and 10%, respectively, below the market 50th percentile. The goal of the Compensation Committee has been to move more of the Named Executive Officers’ total executive compensation to variable, or “at-risk,” and thus further align the interest of the officer with the stockholders by providing the Named Executive Officers a greater stake in our long-term performance. The 2016 restricted stock and PBU grants were consistent with this goal.

Upon vesting on January 30, 2017, the third tranche of PBUs granted on January 31, 2014 to Messrs. Porter and Gerlich settled at 0% and no shares were issued.

All Other Compensation.  The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate on a non-discriminatory basis in the same comprehensive benefits as are offered to all full-time employees. These benefits are provided so as to assure that we are able to maintain a competitive position in terms of attracting and retaining executive officers and other employees.

Tax Deductions for Compensation

In conducting our executive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers the effects of Section 162(m), which denies publicly held companies a tax deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1.0 million paid to their chief executive officer or any of their three other most highly compensated executive officers, other than the chief financial officer, who are employed on the last day of a given year, unless their compensation is based on performance criteria that are established by a compensation committee which is made up of outside directors and approved, as to their material terms, by our stockholders.

In 2016, the Company’s compensation to Mr. Porter exceeded the deductibility limits under Section 162(m). Mr. Porter’s total compensation exceeded the deductibility limit by approximately $509,000, which represented a cost to the Company of approximately $179,000 as a result of the lost tax deduction.

The lost deduction was a result of the determination by the Compensation Committee to provide a service-based retention bonus as well as the value of the restricted stock vesting in 2016 which had been awarded in prior years.  The Compensation Committee believes that this amount, including the cost of the lost tax deduction, was justifiable in order to be competitive with peer companies. As indicated above, the Company will return to its historic performance-based annual incentives in 2017; however, restricted stock does not constitute performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and to the extent our stock price increases a portion of the restricted stock vesting in future years could be nondeductible.  While the Compensation Committee generally considers the deductibility of compensation when making decisions, the Compensation Committee retains the right to pay nondeductible compensation to our Named Executive Officers in order to maintain its flexibility in structuring appropriate compensation programs it feels to be appropriate.

20

 


 

Post Termination Compensation and Benefits

Each of our Named Executive Officers is party to an employment agreement which provides for payments and benefits in connection with certain termination of employment scenarios.

In addition, we maintain a change of control severance plan (the “Severance Plan”), covering all employees, including the Named Executive Officers. The purpose of the Severance Plan is to promote stability and continuity of management and employees in the event a change of control transaction should occur (as defined below). Pursuant to the terms of our Severance Plan, our Named Executive Officers are entitled to receive certain post-termination compensation and benefits upon the occurrence of certain events. In order for the Named Executive Officers to receive payments under the Severance Plan, the Named Executive Officers would have to be terminated within two years of a change of control.

For additional information regarding our employment agreements and the Severance Plan, see “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards” and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below.

Consideration of Previous Shareholder Advisory Vote

In June 2016, our stockholders approved the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described in our 2016 proxy statement, with approximately 79% of stockholder votes cast in favor of our 2016 “say-on-pay” resolution (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes). The Compensation Committee considered these results as evidence of support for our compensation program and decisions as described in our 2016 proxy statement, and as grounds for maintaining a similar approach for 2017.  

Additionally, the Compensation Committee considered and responded to the current economic environment in late 2015 and early 2016 by adopting the following changes for 2016 Named Executive Officer compensation:

 

(i)

Initiation of a salary freeze at 2015 base salary levels until market conditions improve;

 

(ii)

Reduction of 2015 bonus payments made in 2016 below targeted amounts;

 

(iii)

Reduction of 30% of 2016 long-term incentive awards; and

 

(iv)

Adoption of retention bonus program in 2016 to replace the performance-based annual cash incentive award program.  

Hedging Prohibitions

Our insider trading policy prohibits our Named Executive Officers from engaging in any speculative transactions involving our common shares including buying or selling puts or calls, short sales or purchases of securities on margin or otherwise hedging the risk of ownership of our stock. Any such activity would require the approval and authorization of either the CEO or the Chairman of the Audit Committee (in the case of a transaction involving our CEO).

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

Our Board, the Compensation Committee and our executive officers recognize that ownership of our common stock is an effective means by which to align the interests of our directors and officers with those of our stockholders.  The terms of the stock ownership policy for our executive officers and directors is summarized below.

Under the stock ownership policy, our officers and directors are required to hold shares of our common stock as follows:

Officer Position

 

Value of Shares Owned

Chief Executive Officer

 

5x Base Salary

Chief Financial Officer and other Named Executive Officers

 

4x Base Salary

Vice Presidents

 

3x Base Salary

Directors

 

3x Annual Retainer and Chairman Fees

Our officers and directors are required to meet the applicable requirements within three years of appointment to the position subject to the policy.  Only vested shares of common stock are considered under the policy.  The value of stock holdings in any year is determined using the average per share closing price of our common stock for the preceding calendar year.

Officers are required to continuously own sufficient shares to meet the stock ownership requirements once attained.  If an officer attains compliance with the stock ownership policy and subsequently falls below the requirement because of a decrease in the price of our common stock, the officer will be deemed in compliance provided that the officer retains the shares then held.

As of December 31, 2016, all of our Named Executive Officers were in compliance with the stock ownership policy.  

21

 


 

Summary Compensation and Awards

Summary Compensation Table

The following table and discussion below sets forth information about the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our Named Executive Officers during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Base Salary

 

 

Bonus (1)

 

 

Restricted Stock and PBUs (2)

 

 

All Other Compensation (3)

 

 

Total

 

J. Russell Porter

 

2016

 

$

550,000

 

 

$

330,000

 

 

$

1,136,398

 

 

$

10,600

 

 

$

2,026,998

 

President and Chief

 

2015

 

$

550,000

 

 

$

263,537

 

 

$

1,549,738

 

 

$

10,600

 

 

$

2,373,875

 

Executive Officer

 

2014

 

$

535,000

 

 

$

470,804

 

 

$

1,529,006

 

 

$

10,400

 

 

$

2,545,210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael A. Gerlich

 

2016

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

195,000

 

 

$

537,205

 

 

$

10,600

 

 

$

1,067,805

 

Senior Vice President and

 

2015

 

$

325,000

 

 

$

138,424

 

 

$

732,606

 

 

$

10,600

 

 

$

1,206,630

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

2014

 

$

312,000

 

 

$

272,571

 

 

$

690,980

 

 

$

10,400

 

 

$

1,285,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael McCown (4)

 

2016

 

$

29,167

 

 

$

 

 

$

380,423

 

 

$

545,451

 

 

$

955,040

 

Senior Vice President and

 

2015

 

$

350,000

 

 

$

149,072

 

 

$

788,957

 

 

$

10,600

 

 

$

1,298,629

 

Chief Operating Officer

 

2014

 

$

312,000

 

 

$

272,571

 

 

$

566,379

 

 

$

10,400

 

 

$

1,161,350

 

 

 

(1)

Bonus amounts for 2016 represent performance-based annual cash incentive awards earned in 2016 which amount reflects 60% of the 2016 retention award granted and paid in 2016.  Bonus amounts for 2014 and 2015 represent bonuses earned in the year presented but paid in the immediately succeeding year.

(2)

The dollar values of restricted stock and PBU awards provided are equal to the aggregate grant date fair value of such award grants awarded to Messrs. Porter and Gerlich during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”) prior to a deduction for estimated forfeitures related to service-based conditions.  For a description of the assumptions used in calculating these amounts for 2016, see Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 9. Equity Compensation Plans” included in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.  The dollar value of restricted stock and PBU awards provided for Mr. McCown equals the vesting date fair value of the restricted stock and PBUs vested on January 30, 2016.  

(3)

All other compensation for Messrs. Porter and Gerlich and for Mr. McCown for 2014 and 2015 includes the Company’s contribution to the Named Executive Officers’ retirement plans.

(4)

Mr. McCown retired on February 1, 2016.  All other compensation for 2016 for Mr. McCown includes his severance payment of 1.5 times his annual salary, the actual amount paid for his COBRA payments during 2016 and the amount paid to him for his unused vacation.

  Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table shows certain information about the restricted common stock and PBUs granted to our Named Executive Officers during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payout Under

Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)

 

 

All Other

Equity   Awards:

 

 

Grant   Date

Fair Value

 

Name

 

Date

 

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

Grant Date Fair

Value of PBUs (1)

 

 

Number of

Shares   of Stock

 

 

of Stock

Awards (1)

 

J. Russell Porter

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

404,412

 

 

$

481,250

 

J. Russell Porter

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

404,412

 

 

 

808,824

 

 

$

655,147

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Michael A. Gerlich

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,176

 

 

$

227,500

 

Michael A. Gerlich

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

191,176

 

 

 

382,352

 

 

$

309,705

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

(1)

The fair value of the respective restricted share and PBU grants as of the grant date is calculated in accordance with ASC 718 and assumes a target payout of 100% for PBUs. These restricted shares are subject to a 3-year vesting schedule of 33.33% each year, beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant.  These PBUs are subject to a 3-year cliff vesting on the third

22

 


 

anniversary da te of the grant.  Upon vesting, the PBUs can be settled at 0% to 200% depending upon our stock price performance.

(2)

The estimated future payout for PBUs assumes a target payout of 100% of units granted and a maximum payout of 200% of units granted. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis.”

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following is a narrative of our various compensation plans and the general terms of each:

Long-Term Incentive Plan. We maintain a long-term incentive plan which provides our Compensation Committee with the flexibility to grant different types of awards in respect of our common stock including, without limitations, stock options, restricted shares and PBUs. For 2016, our Named Executive Officers received awards in the form of restricted shares and PBUs. For a description of the terms of such awards, see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis-Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation.”

Employee Severance Plan. For the Named Executive Officers, the Severance Plan provides that if a Named Executive Officer’s employment is terminated within two years following a change of control for any reason other than (i) death, (ii) disability, (iii) by us for “cause” or (iv) by the Named Executive Officer for other than a “good reason,” the Named Executive Officer will receive a lump-sum payment equal to a multiple that is equal to the applicable severance period, as set forth in the Severance Plan, times the sum of (1) his annual salary and (2) annual target bonus.

A change of control is defined in the Severance Plan to mean (1) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, reorganization or other transaction whereby our stockholders retain less than 50% control, directly or indirectly, of us or the surviving company, (2) our incumbent directors cease to constitute a majority of the Board or (3) a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets. The Severance Plan does not change the specific, non-change of control severance payments in place under the existing employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers but does provide change of control severance benefits to the Named Executive Officers only if they are greater than the severance benefits provided under the employment agreement. The Severance Plan does not allow for any duplication of severance benefits.

The following summarizes the severance periods and target bonus percentages for the Named Executive Officers set forth in the Severance Plan, as amended:

 

 

 

Severance

Period In

Years

 

 

Target Bonus

Percentage

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

89

%

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

2.50

 

 

 

88

%

 

Additionally, during the applicable severance period, Named Executive Officers would receive reimbursement for the cost of COBRA continuation health care coverage, less the amount charged at the time of termination to the employee for medical coverage.

If the Named Executive Officer receives a payment or benefit that is subject to the “golden parachute” excise tax, the Named Executive Officer will receive an additional payment under the severance plan to make him or her “whole” for that excise tax and any taxes on the additional parachute tax gross-up payment.

If the individual’s employment is terminated within six months prior to a change of control and it is reasonably shown to have been in connection with the change of control, then the change of control will be treated with respect to that employee as having occurred prior to his or her termination.

Employment Agreements. We entered into employment agreements with J. Russell Porter, our President and CEO, and Michael A. Gerlich, our CFO, effective February 24, 2005, and May 17, 2005, respectively, each amended July 25, 2008. Mr. Porter’s employment agreement was amended on February 3, 2011 to remove a provision that allowed him to trigger severance payments by providing the Company with six months’ notice. Mr. Gerlich’s employment agreement was amended on April 10, 2012 (effective as of January 1, 2012) to reflect the change in his target bonus amount used for purposes of determining his severance entitlement under his employment agreement. The agreements with Messrs. Porter and Gerlich set forth, among other things, annual compensation, and adjustments thereto, minimum bonus payments, fringe benefits, termination and severance provisions. The agreements with Messrs. Porter and Gerlich renew annually; however, they may be terminated at any time with or without cause.

23

 


 

Mr. Porter’s employment agreement provides that he is enti tled to a minimum annual bonus in an amount that may take the form of cash compensation, the award of stock or stock options, royalty rights or otherwise and that he shall receive an annual cash bonus equal to at least 20% of his annual base salary. The em ployment agreement further provides that such bonuses shall reflect not only the results of our operations and business, but also his contribution as President and CEO.

Mr. Gerlich’s employment agreement provides that the Compensation Committee may on a yearly basis, or more frequently, award Mr. Gerlich a discretionary bonus or bonuses based not only on the positive results of our operations and business, but Mr. Gerlich’s contribution as CFO. Such bonuses may take the form of cash compensation, the award of common shares or stock options, royalty rights or otherwise.

Salary and Cash Bonus in Proportion to Total Compensation

The following table sets forth the percentage of each Named Executive Officer’s total compensation that we paid in the form of base salary and cash bonus earned (excluding long-term incentive cash awards) for the year 2016.

 

 

 

Base Salary

and Cash

Bonuses as a

Percentage of

Total

Compensation

 

J. Russell Porter

 

 

49%

 

Michael A. Gerlich

 

 

55%

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2016

The following table sets forth information about outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

PBU Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

 

Number of

PBUs That

Have Not

Vested (1)

 

 

Market

Value of

PBUs That

Have Not

Vested (1)

 

 

Number of

Shares of

Restricted

Stock That

Have Not

Vested

 

 

Market

Value of

Shares of

Restricted

Stock That

Have Not

Vested (2)

 

J. Russell Porter (3)

 

3/19/2009

 

 

30,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.60

 

 

3/19/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,793

 

 

$

2,328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

286,458

 

 

$

415,364

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

404,412

 

 

$

845,221

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,793

 

 

$

60,129

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

190,972

 

 

$

296,007

 

 

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

404,412

 

 

$

626,839

 

Michael A. Gerlich (4)

 

3/19/2009

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.60

 

 

3/19/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,528

 

 

$

1,052

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

135,417

 

 

$

196,355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,176

 

 

$

399,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,529

 

 

$

27,170

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90,278

 

 

$

139,931

 

 

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,176

 

 

$

296,323

 

 

(1)

For purposes of this table, we assumed that the unvested PBUs granted on January 30, 2014 will vest at the target of 100% with a fair value of $0.06 per unit on December 31, 2016, the unvested PBUs granted on January 30, 2015 will vest at the target of 100% with a fair value of $1.45 per unit on December 31, 2016 and the unvested PBUs granted on January 30, 2016 will vest at the target of 100% with a fair value of $2.09 per unit on December 31, 2016.

(2)

The closing price of our common shares on December 31, 2016 was $1.55.

(3)

The 38,793 unvested restricted common shares granted to Mr. Porter on January 30, 2014 vested 100% on January 30, 2017.  The 190,972 unvested restricted common shares granted to Mr. Porter on January 30, 2015 vest 50% on January 30, 2017 and

24

 


 

2018, respectively.  The 404,412 unvested restricted common shares granted to Mr. Porter on January 30, 2016 vest 33.3% on January 30, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.  The 38,793 unvested PBUs granted to Mr. Porter on January 30, 2014 vest 100% on January 30, 2017.  The 286,458 unvested PBUs granted to Mr. Porter on January 30, 2015 vest 100% on January 30, 2018.  The 404,412 unvested PBUs granted to Mr. Porter on January 30, 2016 vest 100% on January 30, 2019.  

(4)

The 17,529 unvested restricted common shares granted to Mr. Gerlich on January 30, 2014 vested 100% on January 30, 2017.  The 90,278 unvested restricted common shares granted to Mr. Gerlich on January 30, 2015 vest 50% on January 30, 2017 and 2018, respectively.  The 191,176 unvested restricted common shares granted to Mr. Gerlich on January 30, 2016 vest 33.3% on January 30, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.  The 17,528 unvested PBUs granted to Mr. Gerlich on January 30, 2014 vest 100% on January 30, 2017.  The 135,417 unvested PBUs granted to Mr. Gerlich on January 30, 2015 vest 100% on January 30, 2018.  The 191,176 unvested PBUs granted to Mr. Gerlich on January 30, 2016 vest 100% on January 30, 2019.

Restricted Stock and PBUs Vested for 2016

During the year ended December 31, 2016, our Named Executive Officers exercised no stock options. The following restricted common shares vested to the benefit of our Named Executive Officers during 2016:

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Vesting Date

 

Number of

Shares

Acquired

on Vesting

 

 

Value Realized

on Vesting (1)

 

J. Russell Porter

 

1/30/2013

 

1/30/2016

 

 

161,638

 

 

$

192,349

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

1/30/2016

 

 

38,794

 

 

$

46,165

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

1/30/2016

 

 

95,486

 

 

$

113,628

 

Michael A. Gerlich

 

1/30/2013

 

1/30/2016

 

 

80,819

 

 

$

96,175

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

1/30/2016

 

 

17,528

 

 

$

20,858

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

1/30/2016

 

 

45,139

 

 

$

53,715

 

Michael McCown

 

1/30/2013

 

1/30/2016

 

 

56,034

 

 

$

66,680

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

1/30/2016

 

 

28,736

 

 

$

34,196

 

 

 

1/30/2015

 

1/30/2016

 

 

145,833

 

 

$

173,541

 

 

 

(1)

Equals the closing stock price of our common shares on the day prior to the applicable vesting date multiplied by the number of restricted shares vesting on such date.

 

 

 

Performance Based Units

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Vesting Date

 

Number of

Shares

Acquired on

Vesting (1)

 

 

Value Realized

on Vesting (2)

 

J. Russell Porter

 

1/30/2013

 

1/30/2016

 

 

254,654

 

 

$

303,038

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

$

 

Michael A. Gerlich

 

1/30/2013

 

1/30/2016

 

 

160,200

 

 

$

190,638

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

$

 

Michael McCown

 

1/30/2013

 

1/30/2016

 

 

89,080

 

 

$

106,005

 

 

 

1/30/2014

 

1/30/2016

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

(1)

The third tranche of the January 30, 2013 PBU grant vested at 200% of the amount granted.  The second tranche of the January 30, 2014 PBU grant vested at 0% of the amount granted.  

(2)

Equals the closing stock price of our common shares on the day prior to the applicable vesting date multiplied by the number of PBUs vesting on such date.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

The table below discloses the amount of compensation and/or other benefits due to the Named Executive Officers in the event of their termination of employment, including, but not limited to, in connection with a change in control.

The amounts shown for Messrs. Porter and Gerlich below assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2016, and thus include amounts earned through such date and are estimates of the amounts that would be paid to the Named Executive

25

 


 

Officers upon their respective termination. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time t he Named Executive Officer is terminated.  The amounts shown for Mr. McCown represent the actual amounts received upon his retirement on February 1, 2016.

Named Executive Officer and Post Termination Benefits

 

Termination for

other than

Reasonable

Cause ( 1)

 

 

Constructive

Termination and

Termination in

Connection with

Change of

Control (2)

 

 

Termination for

Reasonable

Cause (3)

 

 

Death (1)(4)

 

 

Disability (1)(4)

 

J. Russell Porter:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salary

 

$

2,475,000

 

 

$

3,118,500

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,475,000

 

 

$

2,475,000

 

Accrued Vacation

 

 

16,659

 

 

 

16,659

 

 

 

16,659

 

 

 

16,659

 

 

 

16,659

 

Paid health and medical

 

 

32,274

 

 

 

32,274

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,274

 

 

 

32,274

 

Parachute tax gross-up payment (5)

 

 

 

 

 

1,253,448

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation (6)